Prie Vilties Kryžiaus

This publication represents a foundational document of Lithuanian-American Catholic anti-communist intellectual culture, produced at the precise historical hinge point of 1948 when Lithuanian displaced persons were arriving in the United States and needed ideological as well as spiritual grounding. Dr. Prunskis's choice to compile international conversion-from-communism testimonies — drawing on Dorothy Day, Clare Boothe Luce, a Latvian diplomat, a Russian Orthodox bishop, and Rome's chief rabbi Zolli — and to present them in Lithuanian demonstrates the sophistication of the early diaspora's intellectual project: they were not merely producing ethnic devotional material but positioning Lithuanian Catholics as participants in a global Cold War Catholic resistance narrative. The hammer-and-sickle-under-the-cross cover image is an artifact of diaspora visual rhetoric that deserves study in its own right.

The institutional infrastructure visible here is equally significant: a Lithuanian Catholic priest (Kun. P. M. Juras) functioning as a micro-publisher in Chicago in 1948 represents the first generation of diaspora self-publishing that would eventually coalesce into institutions like Draugas press. Prunskis himself would become one of the most prolific Lithuanian-American authors, and this early work shows his characteristic method — compilation, translation, synthesis — applied to the urgent task of inoculating a traumatized refugee community against communist ideology by demonstrating its spiritual bankruptcy through the testimonies of its former adherents. The bibliographic list ('Panaudotos knygos,' p. 140) signals that this is a properly sourced scholarly-popular hybrid, not mere propaganda.

For the diaspora school context in which this volume survived (Žiburio, Detroit), its value would have been as a supplementary text demonstrating that Lithuanian Catholic identity was not parochial but cosmopolitan — that the same cross that stood over Lithuania stood over all peoples resisting Soviet tyranny. The volume thus served both a pastoral function (strengthening faith against communist family members left behind) and a political one (legitimizing Lithuanian exile claims to an American Catholic audience already primed by the Cold War to receive such arguments).

Religion as language vessel, Faith framed as heritage, Identity preservation, Continuity statement explicit